IMB > Recherche > Séminaires

Groupe de travail Analyse

Les exposés couvrent essentiellement les thématiques autour de l’analyse complexe, la théorie des opérateurs, l’analyse harmonique, l’analyse fonctionnelle, la théorie spectrale et la modélisation (responsables : Sylvain Golénia, Andreas Hartmann et Elizabeth Strouse).

  • Le 6 mai 2024 à 14:00
  • Groupe de Travail Analyse
    Salle de conférences
    Armand Koenig IMB
    Controllability, coercivity inequalities and Nullstellsensatz - partie 1

    Consider a control system 𝛛t f + Af = Bu. Assume that 𝛱 is

    a projection and that you can control both the systems

     𝛛t f + 𝛱Af = 𝛱Bu,

     𝛛t f + (1-𝛱)Af = (1-𝛱)Bu.

    Can you conclude that the first system itself is controllable ? We

    cannot expect it in general. But in a joint work with Andreas Hartmann,

    we managed to do it for the half-heat equation. It turns out that the

    property we need for our case is:

     If 𝛺 satisfies some cone condition, the set {f+g, f∈L²(𝛺), g∈L²(𝛺),

    f is holomorphic, g is anti-holomorphic} is closed in L²(𝛺).

     

    The first proof by Friedrichs consists of long computations, and is

    very "complex analysis". But a later proof by Shapiro uses quite

    general coercivity estimates proved by Smith, whose proof uses some

    tools from algebra : Hilbert's nullstellensatz and/or primary ideal

    decomposition.


    In this first talk, we will introduce the algebraic tools needed and

    present Smith's coercivity inequalities. In a second talk, we will

    explain how useful these inequalities are to study the control

    properties of the half-heat equation.


  • Le 13 mai 2024 à 14:00
  • Groupe de Travail Analyse
    Salle 1
    Armand Koenig IMB
    Controllability, coercivity inequalities and Nullstellsensatz - partie 2

    Consider a control system 𝛛t f + Af = Bu. Assume that 𝛱 is

    a projection and that you can control both the systems

     𝛛t f + 𝛱Af = 𝛱Bu,

     𝛛t f + (1-𝛱)Af = (1-𝛱)Bu.

    Can you conclude that the first system itself is controllable ? We

    cannot expect it in general. But in a joint work with Andreas Hartmann,

    we managed to do it for the half-heat equation. It turns out that the

    property we need for our case is:

     If 𝛺 satisfies some cone condition, the set {f+g, f∈L²(𝛺), g∈L²(𝛺),

    f is holomorphic, g is anti-holomorphic} is closed in L²(𝛺).

     

    The first proof by Friedrichs consists of long computations, and is

    very "complex analysis". But a later proof by Shapiro uses quite

    general coercivity estimates proved by Smith, whose proof uses some

    tools from algebra : Hilbert's nullstellensatz and/or primary ideal

    decomposition.


    In this first talk, we will introduce the algebraic tools needed and

    present Smith's coercivity inequalities. In a second talk, we will

    explain how useful these inequalities are to study the control

    properties of the half-heat equation.


  • Le 27 mai 2024 à 14:00
  • Groupe de Travail Analyse
    Salle de conférences
    Bernard Haak IMB
    TBA

  • Le 3 juin 2024 à 14:00
  • Groupe de Travail Analyse
    Salle de conférences
    Stanislas Kupin IMB
    TBA

  • Le 10 juin 2024 à 14:00
  • Groupe de Travail Analyse
    Salle de conférences
    Bernhard Haak IMB
    TBA

    Les séminaires à partir de 2014